The word and the genre dāstān is unrecognisable as a theoretical category. Even great works of the genre like the Ḥamzanāma that have been popular for centuries in Iran and the Indian Subcontinent have been relegated to the literary sidelines. Research on dāstān literature has long been an academic backwater in the study of medieval Persian literature, first and foremost because of the evaluative and hierarchical approaches to literature still prevalent in the field.
This panel aims to look at the dāstān as a genre category that requires a poetics of its own so that the word and the genre ceases to be a verbal nomad. It is an attempt to define the dāstān as a genre both in the mediaeval period and in contemporary times and open it to inquiry and debate for a larger academic audience. In this regard, the first paper titled “Dāstān: A Theory” seeks to understand the genre as an ‘areligious’ and ‘ahistorical’ storytelling space. It uses the words ‘areligious’ and ‘ahistorical’ as antonyms of irreligious and fictional and not as opposites of religious and historical. The implication being that the religiosity and historicity of the dāstān, though omnipresent, is held in abeyance for the duration of the story.
The second paper titled “What Can Medieval Persian Folk Narratives in Prose Tell Us About the Poetic Canon(s)?” aims to show the importance of the dāstān genre as an integral part of the literary system of mediaeval Persian literature by examining verse insertions authored by various poets and found in some of the dāstāns. This investigation will help assess the reception of particular poets in the periods when specific dāstāns were compiled and/or copied; as such, it will enhance our knowledge of the nature and make-up of poetic canon(s) and the mechanisms of their formation as time- and place-sensitive entities.
The third paper, “Ḥamzanāma: The Various Versions” investigates and compares the different versions of the dāstān in Iran and in India. While there are many different manuscripts of the Ḥamzanāma, only a few have been scholarly investigated. The paper will compare four manuscripts spanning five centuries to gauge and analyse how this specific dāstān developed over time and geographical space.
The fourth paper titled “Dismembering the Dāstān” discusses the damage done to the Mughal Ḥamzanāma when the story-text was separated from the miniature paintings. These paintings were sold for their artistic value without regard to the inspiration behind them: the narrative.
